A Letter To Senator Obama

October 30, 2008

The New York Times carried a story on Saturday, October 4, 2008, that proved you had a significantly closer relationship with Bill Ayers than what you previously admitted. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.

The Chicago Sun reported on May 8, 2008, that FBI records showed that you had a significantly closer relationship with Tony Rezko than what you previously admitted. In the interview, you said that you only saw Mr. Rezko a couple of times a year. The FBI files showed that you saw him weekly. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.

Your speech in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008, about "race" contradicted your statement to Anderson Cooper on March 14 when you said that you never heard Reverend Wright make his negative statements about white America. While your attendance at Trinity Church for 20 years is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on March 14.

In your 1st debate with John McCain, you said that you never said that you would meet with the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea without "preparations" at lower levels ... Joe Biden repeated your words in his debate with Sarah Palin ... while the video tape from your debate last February clearly shows that you answered "I would" to the question of meeting with those leaders within 12 months without "any" preconditions. While your judgement about meeting with enemies of the USA without preconditions is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America in the debate with McCain.

On July 14, 2008, you said that you always knew that the surge would work while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you stated that the surge would not work. While your judgement about military strategy as a potential commander-in-chief is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on July 14.

You now claim that your reason for voting against funding for the troops was because the bill did not include a time line for withdrawal, while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you voted against additional funding because you wanted our troops to be removed immediately ... not in 16 months after the 2008 election as you now claim. While your judgement about removing our troops unilaterally in 2007 is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about your previous position.

You claim to have a record of working with Republicans while the record shows that the only bill that you sponsored with a Republican was with Richard Lugar ... and it failed. The record shows that you vote 97% in concert with the Democrat party and that you have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. You joined Republicans only 13% of the time in your votes and those 13% were only after agreement from the Democrat party. While it is of concern that you fail to include conservatives in your actions and that you are such a liberal, the greater concern is that you distorted the truth.

In the primary debates of last February, 2008, you claimed to have talked with a "Captain" of a platoon in Afghanistan "the other day" when in fact you had a discussion in 2003 with a Lieutenant who had just been deployed to Afghanistan . You lied in that debate.

In your debates last spring, you claimed to have been a "professor of Constitutional law" when in fact you have never been a professor of Constitutional law. In this last debate, you were careful to say that you "taught a law class" and never mentioned being a "professor of Constitutional law." You lied last spring.

You and Joe Biden both claimed that John McCain voted against additional funding for our troops when the actual records show the opposite. You distorted the truth.

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted against funding for alternate energy sources 20 times when the record shows that John McCain specifically voted against funding for bio-fuels, especially corn ... and he was right .... corn is too expensive at producing ethanol, and using corn to make ethanol increased the price of corn from $2 a bushel to $6 a bushel for food. You distorted the truth.

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted like both of you for a tax increase on those making as little as $42,000 per year while the voting record clearly shows that John McCain did not vote as you and Joe Biden. You lied to America .

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted with George W. Bush 90% of the time when you know that Democrats also vote 90% of the time with the President (including Joe Biden) because the vast majority of the votes are procedural. You are one of the few who has not voted 90% of the time with the president because you have been missing from the Senate since the day you got elected. While your absence from your job in the Senate is of concern, the greater concern is that you spin the facts.

You did not take an active role in the rescue plan. You claimed that the Senate did not need you while the real reason that you abstained was because of your close relationships with the executives of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and Acorn ... who all helped cause the financial problems of today ... and they all made major contributions to your campaign. While your relationship with these executives and your protection of them for your brief 3 years in the Senate (along with Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd) is of concern, the greater concern is that you are being deceitful.

You forgot to mention that you personally represented Tony Rezko and Acorn. Tony Rezko, an Arab and close friend to you, was convicted of fraud in Chicago real estate transactions that bilked millions of tax dollars from the Illinois government for renovation projects that you sponsored as a state senator ... and Acorn has been convicted of voter fraud, real estate sub prime loan intimidation, and illegal campaign contributions. Tony Rezko has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to your political campaigns. You personally used your political positions to steer money to both Tony Rezko and Acorn and you used Acorn to register thousands of phony voters for Democrats and you. While your relationships with Rezko and Acorn are of concern, the greater concern is that you omitted important facts about your relationships with them to America .

During your campaign, you said: "typical white person." "They cling to their guns and religion." "They will say that I am black." You played the race card. You tried to label any criticism about you as racist. You divide America .

You claim that you will reduce taxes for 95% of America , but you forgot to tell America that those reductions are after you remove the Bush tax reductions.

You have requested close to $1 billion in earmarks and several million for Acorn. Your social programs will cost America $1 trillion per year and you claim that a reduction in military spending ($100 billion for Iraq ) can pay for it. While your economic plan of adding 30% to the size of our federal government is of concern, the greater concern is that you are deceiving America.

The drain to America 's economy by foreign supplied oil is $700 billion per year (5% of GDP) while the war in Iraq is $100 billion (less than 1% of GDP). You voted against any increases to oil exploration for the last 3 years and any expansion of nuclear facilities. Yet today, you say that you have always been for more oil and more nuclear. You are lying to America. Mr. Obama, you claimed that you "changed" your mind about public financing for your campaign because of the money spent by Republican PACs in 2004. The truth is that the Democrat PACs in 2004, 2006, and 2008 spent twice as much as the Republican PACs (especially George Soros and MoveOn.org). You are lying to America.

Mr. Obama, you have done nothing to stop the actions of the teachers union and college professors in the USA. They eliminated religion from our history. They teach pro gay agendas and discuss sex with students as young as first grade. They bring their personal politics into the classrooms. They disparage conservatives. They brainwash our children. They are in it for themselves ..... not America . Are you reluctant to condemn their actions because teachers/professors and the NEA contribute 25% of all money donated to Democrats and none to Republicans? You are deceiving America.

Oh, Mr. Obama, Teddy Roosevelt said about a hundred years ago that we Americans should first look at the character of our leaders before anything else.
Your character looks horrible. While you make good speeches, motivating speeches, your character does not match your rhetoric. You talk the talk, but do not walk the walk.

1. You lied to America . You lied many times. You distorted facts. You parsed your answers like a lawyer.

2. You distorted the record of John McCain in your words and in your advertisements.

3. You had associations with some very bad people for your personal political gains and then lied about those associations.

4. You divide America about race and about class. Now let me compare your record of lies, distortions, race baiting, and associations to John McCain: War hero. Annapolis graduate with "Country first." Operational leadership experience like all 43 previously elected presidents of the USA as a Navy officer for 22 years. 26 years in the Senate. Straight talk. Maverick. 54% of the time participated on bills with Democrats. Never asked for an earmark. The only blemish on his record is his part in the Keating 5 debacle about 25 years ago. Mr. Obama, at Harvard Law School, you learned that the end does not justify the means. You learned that perjury, false witness, dishonesty, distortion of truth are never tolerated. Yet, your dishonesty is overwhelming. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty that caused the impeachment and disbarment of Bill Clinton. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty of Scooter Libby. You should be ashamed.

Mr. Obama, it is time for Americans to put aside our differences on political issues and vote against you because of your dishonest character. It is time for all of us Americans to put aside our political issues and vote for America first. It is time for America to vote for honesty.

Any person who votes for you after understanding that you are dishonest should be ashamed of themselves for making their personal political issues more important than character. Would these same people vote for the anti-Christ if the anti-Christ promised them riches? Would they make a golden calf while Moses was up the mountain? Would they hire someone for a job if that someone lied in an interview? Of course not. So why do some of these people justify their votes for you even though they know you are dishonest? Why do they excuse your dishonesty? Because some of these people are frightened about the future, the economy, and their financial security .... and you are preying on their fears with empty promises ... and because some (especially our young people) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for "change" like the Germans who voted for Adolf Hitler in 1932. The greed/envy by Germans in 1932 kept them from recognizing Hitler for who he was. They loved his style.


Greed and envy are keeping many Americans from recognizing you ... your style has camouflaged your dishonesty .... but many of us see you for who you really are ... and we will not stop exposing who you are every day, forever if it is necessary.

Mr. Obama, you are dishonest. Anyone who votes for you is enabling dishonesty.

Mr. Obama , America cannot trust that you will put America first in your decisions about the future.

Mr. Obama, you are not the "change" that America deserves. We cannot trust you.

Mr. Obama, You are not ready and not fit to be commander-in-chief.

Mr. Obama, John McCain does not have as much money as your campaign to refute all of your false statements. And for whatever reasons, the mainstream media will not give adequate coverage or research about your lies, distortions, word parsing, bad associations, race baiting, lack of operational leadership experience, and generally dishonest character. The media is diverting our attention from your relationships and ignoring the fact that you lied about those relationships. The fact that you lied is much more important than the relationships themselves .... just like with Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon ... Monica Lewinski and Watergate were not nearly as bad as the fact that those men lied about the events ... false witness ... perjury ... your relationships and bad judgments are bad on their own .... but your lies are even worse.

We need to expose your dishonesty so that every person in America understands who you really are before election day. Mr. Obama, in a democracy, we get what we deserve. And God help America if we deserve you.

Force The L.A. Times To Show Their "Secret Video"

Media Research Center
From the Desk of:
Brent Bozell, Founder and President


++Your Immediate Action Requested++ (see details below)

Ed,

With less than a week before Election Day, the L.A. Times has decided to withhold a potentially explosive video featuring presidential candidate Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi, a pro-terrorist radical and one-time spokesman for the late PLO head Yasser Arafat, rather than allow the public to view the video and make up their own minds.

According to the L.A. Times report, the video shows Obama reminiscing about meals prepared by Khalidi's wife, and"conversations that had challenged his thinking, " but released no other details of the video.

If the L.A. Times professes to be in the news business, it should reveal all the news, not suppress it.

Ed, given Obama's longtime, personal relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose anti-Israel rhetoric has been oft repeated, it's essential Americans have an opportunity to view the truths found on that videotape--before the election!

++ Action Item--Contact the L.A. Times

On the heals of an amazingly successful grassroots initiative directed at CNN just days ago, I'm urging members of the MRC Action Team to take fast action by contacting the L.A. Times and demanding they immediately release this video.

Go here to access the L.A. Times article, and send your personalized email to key L.A. Times staff:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=12866&CID=506&RID=16303894

Ed, at this late hour, we cannot allow the liberal media to withhold key information from the American public.

We simply must take to task whenever we see liberal media bias--and this is certainly a prime example.

Please take immediate action by contacting the L.A. Times today,demanding release of that potentially explosive video by clicking here:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=12867&CID=506&RID=16303894

After sending your emails, and making your phone calls, forward this message to 20-30 friends urging them to follow your lead by clicking here:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=12868&CID=506&RID=16303894

Again, there is far too much at stake to allow the liberal media elite to dictate what stories we are fed each day. The media have a responsibility to report the truth, and we must hold them accountable whenever necessary.

With your help, I believe we can make a difference here!

Thank you for your support!

Brent Bozell
Founder and President


P.S. Again, once you have sent your emails, please also call L.A. Times publisher, Eddy Hartenstein at 213-237-7001 and demand they release the Obama video.

++ Click here to take immediate action:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=12869&CID=506&RID=16303894

Guest Post From The Comments Section

I thought these comments were interesting enough to make a regular post out of them. I do not know either of these people, and I haven't done a "fact check" but wanted to get this into the post area.

Cyber Pastor

After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in "other" ways, I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propaganda, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections.

This is what is happening now in America.

Everything I have researched in the last two years, has led me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA.

There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks, Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.

On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago, and the transcript highlights, in Yuri's own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph.

I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation's television channels, Venezuela's authoritarian president Hugo ChÃvez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country's attention to more urgent matters.

The time had come, he explained, to move the "Bolivarian revolution" from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last "broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system", he said.

The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy. The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution a document ChÃvez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999.

The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez's promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo ChÃvez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power.

It's a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional "reform", especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President ChÃvez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government's refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country's oldest and most anti-ChÃvez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.

Marion Valentine Homepage 10.28.08 - 1:45 pm



Valentine -

Confirming. My uncle was in the Navy in the early 1950s, and joined a Naval Reserve intelligence unit when he got out of the service. Aunt and Uncle had small children and worked with the PTA. He discovered that Communists were infiltrating grade schools at that time (late 1950s, Arizona) and got into politics to combat the traitors.

This is a long standing problem, and we are late confronting it.

Iago 10.28.08 - 3:15 pm

I raised 6 kids (three adopted) worked in Scouting and the Royal Ambassadors, was at one time appointed gaurdian of 17 kids while working as volunteer with the county Youth Court. The Children are the future, and to have them brainwashed in or public education system and universites is happening, has been happening, and will happen until We The People have had enough, and only allow our kids to attend the Conservative Universities. Tell the liberal politicians and media to go to hell by not watching or buying liberal media, and working to get the liberals out of office now matter which state we are they are in.

Marion Valentine Homepage 10.28.08 - 5:09 pm

Fairness Doctrine Obama Style

by Garry

Obama and Hugo Chavez have a few things in common, both Socialists, both thugs, both interested in and schooled in clearing the field of all rivals.

So it should be no surprise for the world at large or the American public that Obama, if given half a chance to exert his power will clear the field nationaly the same way he's done in the past in Chicago Thug Politics. In much the same way Hugo Chavez is now trying to do in Venezuela by agitating for his main political rival to be thrown into prison on charges for which Hugo can offer no specific evidence. A lot like Obama's experience - no specific evidence.

Obama will almost undoubtedly institute some form of the Fairness Doctrine if he is elected. The stifling of dissent is what the Left is nearly always clamoring and whining about. The rallying cry tends to be "We can't make it in the Free Market, so the Free Market is unfair to us boo hoo, boo hoo."

Obama, like Chavez would attempt to consolidate his power base. With no thoughts for the nation as a whole, but purely for monetary and ideological reasons. Remember this if nothing else, Socialists may make a lot of noise about the discrepancies of how a Capitalist society works, but when the Socialists gain the power, the regime leaders live the fat life. The common masses may have to live like dogs, begging for the scraps, but the leaders have all they need with all of the perks which goes with having all the control.

Just like North Korea, there may be two or three million people starving to death this year alone due to drought and then storms in the rice growing regions, but you will notice the bloated corpulence of Kim Jong "I'm So" Il is always apparent at every appearance he makes.

Except for now, since the reported brain surgery, and the lack of appearances he makes. The brain surgery by the way was a failure, none could be found. Just a large and secondary spleen pumping out venality and hatred for humanity in general.

One last thought, do remember the quote from Vladimir Lenin: The Butcher of Russia
"The goal of socialism, is communism"

That should bring into stark relief the reason why the fight against The Obama IS SO IMPORTANT.

The socialism The Chosen Witless One will lead America to is just a waypoint to the ultimate goal of communism and the crushing of all which made this nation the beacon of personal freedom it used to be.

The right, the duty and responsibility of every American is to protect what it is to be American, to protect what sets us apart from the European socialists and allowed us to be a destination dream for the rest of the worlds poor.

Last I looked, the number of people sneaking into Cuba, Zimbabwe, China, North Korea or Venezuela matched the number who were just passing through on the way to somemwhere else. Most notably, on their way to America.

A Simple Explaination of the Redistribution of Wealth

I got this in an email from my Aunt Pat. Probably a made up story, but it sure makes a point.

Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.

Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.

When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside.

The server angrily stormed from my sight.

I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.

At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved money more.

I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.

What the Dems Said About Colin Powell Before "The Endorsement"

Received these two emails from the National Black Republican Association :

DEMOCRATS DENOUNCED
GENERAL COLIN POWELL AS A "HOUSE NEGRO"

Democrats now love General Colin Powell, but spewed out the most vile, racist attacks on Powell before he endorsed Obama.

Al Sharpton: General Colin Powell is a "House Negro" - A video that was shot by WKRN Video Journalist Beau Fleenor at Tennessee State University in Nashville, Tennessee shows Al Sharpton denigrating General Colin Powell as a "House Negro." The Question: "Rev. Al Sharpton, do you believe that political leaders such as Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell are viewed as "house negroes" by other African Americans, by going along with the President against their beliefs?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdVjrBY5-F0

Harry Belafonte: General Colin Powell is a "House Negro" - An article that appeared in a Portland, Oregon paper was one of many exposing how hardly a ripple of protest was made by black Democrats when Harry Belafonte publicly denounced General Colin Powell as a "House Negro."
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2002/10/27103.shtml


OBAMA DISAGREES WITH COLIN POWELL

One the heels of General Colin Powell's surprising endorsement of Senator Barack Obama, a video was uncovered in which Obama makes the shocking confession that he, Obama, does not have the experience or qualifications to be president of the United States and, thus, the leader of the free world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BnLozS-TnM

In spite of the efforts by the liberal media to denigrate Governor Sarah Palin, a comparison of the experiences of Obama with Palin shows that Palin is better qualified to be president than Obama. http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/aug/30/tale-of-the-tape-sarah-palin-vs-barack-obam/

Gotta Love This!

No description necessary, but this was in a yard in our hometown when we returned from DC. Gotta love the creative genious of some people.

CP

Did They Watch The Same Debate I Did?

After watching John McCain soundly and conviningly spank Nobama all over the floor in last night's debate, I wake up this morning to watch and read that Nobama either "held his own" or clearly won the debate.

WHAT ARE PEOPLE SMOKING WHO BELIEVE THAT??????

From "I'm not George Bush" to "Joe the Plumber" to the "washed up old terrorist" just to name three, Nobama was clearly on the defensive and many times looked flustered and out of whack, McCain was on offensive and certainly in control.

To me it was a man debating a child, and Senator John McCain was clearly the man!

We still have a lot of work ahead, but victory can and will be seen! I added the Nobama - Rev Wrong picture just so you never forget.

Don't give up!

Cyber Pastor

Breaking Story: "Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald Could Indeed Send Barak Obama to Jail"

URGENT: Big story about to break, we are one step closer to Rezko giving Obama up to federal prosecutors

 

Hat tip to Norman Hooben. Also posted at RADARSITE.

From Liberty Republican
Oct 10, '08
by Becki for group libertyrepublican

 

The Sun Times today gave a major clue that Barack Obama will indeed go down with Tony Rezko, sooner rather than later.  It looks as though Rezko is about to turn on Alexi Giannoulias, the 30-year old State Treasurer of Illinois (who was elected only because Obama backed him).

Here’s where all the clues are…and then we’ll walk you through the local Chicago politics on how today’s hint by the Sun Times has us convinced, for the first time ever, that prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald could indeed send Barack Obama to jail.

We need to repeat that: we never believed, until now, that Obama would go to jail for anything related to Rezko. Today, this breaking news about what Rezko is singing to the Feds about makes us reconsider all of that.

Barack Obama will serve a prison sentence in the next few years — because knowing Fitzgerald, there is no reason he would be going through all of this if that was not the targeted goal in the long term.

(1) Michael Sneed in her Sun Times column 10/10/08 had the following tidbit:

Sneed hears rumbles political fund-raiser/fixer Tony Rezko, who is now singing sweetly to the feds from his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, has been talking about his “dealings” with a Chicago bank, which has political connections.

(2) We just spoke with someone well-connected in Chicago politics who told us that the bank Sneed is talking about has to be Broadway Bank, which is owned by the politically-connected Giannoulias family. We were told that Sneed’s column confirms rumblings people we know heard independently that Tony Rezko is giving up the Giannoulias family to Patrick Fitzgerald — Rezko and the Giannoulias family are as close and tied together as anyone in Chicago could be. If Rezko is turning on them, then Rezko is going to give up Governor Rod Blagojevich and Obama too.

We don’t want to end up in cement shoes for implying anything here, but if you live in Chicago for any length of time, you hear rumors about Broadway Bank, the Giannoulias family, and insert Tony Soprano references here. Kapeech?

(3) So, Rezko is singing about the Giannoulias family and its longtime “business dealings” in Chicago, which would interest someone like Fitzgerald and the Justice Department, who have had a long ambition to crack Soprano-style business dealings in Chicago (the city known for Al Capone hasn’t changed much, really). The next plate to drop in this will be Fitzgerald then leaning on the Giannoulias family to give up someone bigger than them, who Fitzgerald once discussed in terms of hoping “he has the morals to do the right thing”, to paraphrase. We now believe that person Fitz was talking about is Barack Obama.

(4) The Giannoulias family was involved with Obama as far back as his first state senate campaign in 1996. It has been long rumored here in Chicago that Obama obtained a sweetheart deal on his first town home here in Chicago — which he could not have afforded otherwise — and guess who the financing came from for that house? We’ve been told it was Broadway Bank, the Giannoulias bank. Now, this sets up a scenario where the Giannoulias family helps Obama with his campaign finances and gets him deeper in their pocket with his sweetheart mortgage deal (for the first home he owned that he could not afford) – all in exchange for quid pro quo to be determined later.

(5) One favor political Chicago claims Obama did for the Giannoulias family was in 2006 when, out of the blue, 29 year old Alexi Giannoulias, with no experience, and without ever having voted before, decides to run for State Treasurer of Illinois. Also out of the blue, Barack Obama endorses Alexi Giannoulias for State Treasurer. This was a SHOCK to everyone in Chicago — and Giannoulias would have never become State Treasurer without Obama’s help. In political circles here, it has always been believed that this endorsement was bought years ago with that sweetheart mortgage deal Broadway Bank arranged for Obama to buy his town house.

(6) So, the Tony Rezko sweetheart deal was not the first magic home loan Obama ever received to buy a house he could not afford.

There’s more to this that looks like it will break soon.  We were STUNNED when we read Sneed’s column because we never in a million years believed Fitz would actually be able to take down Obama.

We do not believe this will come out before the election, however, but we do believe Fitzgerald will continue his prosecution to the highest level, because that is what he does. Jean Valjean got off easy, compared to what it’s like to be in the crosshairs of perhaps the greatest prosecutor this nation has had in a generation. Patrick Fitzgerald is a force of nature.

Sneed’s clue can only mean Broadway Bank…we’ve now heard this from several people in Chicago. And Broadway Bank can only mean Giannoulias.  And Giannoulias leads to Obama through that town house home loan and the quid pro quo political endorsement several years later. And that home loan ties back to Rezko, in that it was the first of two shady home buys Obama made with quid pro quos attached to them.

Just thinking that last paragraph out, Obama’s defense in the Rezko business was that he never did anything for Rezko so there was no quid pro quo.  What the Giannoulias and Broadway Bank stuff proves is that Obama sits in people’s pockets for a while before the favor is given. He bought that town house sometime between 1997-2000 or so, since he lived there for a few years before trading up to the Obama Mansion with Rezko’s help in 2005, after he was in the United States Senate. And it looks like the payback was not given to the Giannoulias family until 2006, with Obama’s endorsement of Alexi Giannoulias for State Treasurer.

This all stems from Sneed’s clue in today’s Sun Times.  She says to stay tuned for more, so please do that.

Bert Speaks Out

Our good friend and Cyber Crew member Bert has been submitting some excellent comments lately - many are worthy of their own posts. This is one of them.

CP


Friends, Family and God!

One thing that just jumps out at me is the fear many people in this country feel at this time. And when I look at the people immediately around me, I don't sense the fear in them that others express. It is no secret. It is that while we, and I write of conservatives, face the same issues, we are not alone. I give you a couple of examples.

There's a couple I know whose house flat burned to the ground. Even before the firefighters left, their church members were there helping salvage, offer shelter, and all the other things that were necessary at the moment to ease the pain of such a loss.

In another case, a real friend was pretty despondent because his work had fallen off and he was worried about providing for his family. Long and short of it, another member of the same veteran's group he belonged to, really had work needing to be done and contacted him to contract for it. Wasn't charity, it was real work, but he gave my friend a shot at the job because he felt a veteran's bond with another.

One more involves another person I know well with throat cancer. To make a long story short, the men and ladies of his Legion Post attend to him every day to help him get support and those items to sustain him. His church friends get together to take his wife grocery shopping because she is unable to drive. And they have been doing this for weeks now.

When I read the doom and gloom stories in the media and read how Obama will save us from all things bad, I ask myself this:

Are they looking to him because they have no one else to look to? Are they that lonely that they have no friends to ask for help if it was needed? Is that why they are what they are?

I don't know the answer. All I can know is my own situation. Whatever comes, I have strength from the Lord and if that's not enough, he has given me good friends to help with the rest.

And no law but God's own has to be written to command these communities to help. These are poorly written words, but what ever comes now or in the future-- election losses, economic distress, or wars against us-- no better way to meet them head on than without fear and with real friends, family, and God.

The Man Who Never Was

By Tony Blankley
September 24, 2008

The mainstream media have gone over the line and are now straight-out propagandists for the Obama campaign.

While they have been liberal and blinkered in their worldview for decades, in 2007-08, for the first time, the major media consciously are covering for one candidate for president and consciously are knifing the other. This is no longer journalism; it is simply propaganda. (The American left-wing version of the Volkischer Beobachter cannot be far behind.)

And as a result, we are less than seven weeks away from possibly electing a president who has not been thoroughly or even halfway honestly presented to the country by our watchdogs -- the press. The image of Obama that the press has presented to the public is not a fair approximation of the real man. They consciously have ignored whole years of his life and have shown a lack of curiosity about such gaps, which bespeaks a lack of journalistic instinct.

Thus, the public image of Obama is of a "man who never was."

I take that phrase from a 1956 movie about a real-life World War II British intelligence operation to trick the Germans into thinking the Allies were going to invade Greece rather than Sicily in 1943. Operation Mincemeat involved the acquisition of a human corpse dressed as "Major William Martin, R.M.," which was put into the sea near Spain. Attached to the corpse was a briefcase containing fake letters suggesting that the Allied attack would be against Sardinia and Greece.

To make the operation credible, British intelligence concocted a fictional life for the corpse, creating a letter from a lover and tickets to a London theater -- all the details of a life, but not the actual life of the dead young man whose corpse was being used. So, too, the man the media have presented to the nation as Obama is not the real man.

The mainstream media ruthlessly and endlessly repeat any McCain gaffes while ignoring Obama gaffes. You have to go to weird little web sites to see all the stammering and stuttering that Obama needs before getting out a sentence fragment or two. But all you see on the networks is an eventually clear sentence from Obama. You don't see Obama's ludicrous gaffe that Iran is a tiny country and no threat to us. Nor his 57 American states gaffe. Nor his forgetting, if he ever knew, that Russia has a veto in the U.N. Nor his whining and puerile "come on" when he is being challenged. This is the kind of editing one would expect from Goebbels' disciples, not Cronkite's.

More appalling, a skit on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" last weekend suggested that Gov. Palin's husband had sex with his own daughters. That show was written with the assistance of Al Franken, Democratic Party candidate in Minnesota for the U.S. Senate. Talk about incest.

But worse than all the unfair and distorted reporting and image projecting are the shocking gaps in Obama's life that are not reported at all. The major media simply have not reported on Obama's two years at New York's Columbia University, where, among other things, he lived a mere quarter-mile from former terrorist Bill Ayers. Later, they both ended up as neighbors and associates in Chicago. Obama denies more than a passing relationship with Ayers. Should the media be curious? In only two weeks, the media have focused on all the colleges Gov. Palin has attended, her husband's driving habits 20 years ago, and the close criticism of the political opponents Gov. Palin had when she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska. But in two years, they haven't bothered to see how close Obama was with the terrorist Ayers.

Nor have the media paid any serious attention to Obama's rise in Chicago politics. How did honest Obama rise in the famously sordid Chicago political machine with the full support of Boss Daley? Despite the great -- and unflattering -- details on Obama's Chicago years presented in David Freddoso's new book on Obama, the mainstream media continue to ignore both the facts and the book. It took a British publication, The Economist, to give Freddoso's book a review with fair comment.

The public image of Obama as an idealistic, post-race, post-partisan, well-spoken and honest young man with the wisdom and courage befitting a great national leader is a confection spun by a willing conspiracy of Obama, his publicist (David Axelrod) and most of the senior editors, producers and reporters of the national media.

Perhaps that is why the National Journal's respected correspondent Stuart Taylor wrote, "The media can no longer be trusted to provide accurate and fair campaign reporting and analysis."

That conspiracy not only has Photoshopped out all of Obama's imperfections (and dirtied up his opponent McCain's image) but also has put most of his questionable history down the memory hole.

The public will be voting based on the idealized image of the man who never was. If he wins, however, we will be governed by the sunken, cynical man Obama really is. One can only hope that the senior journalists will be judged as harshly for their professional misconduct as Wall Street's leaders currently are for their failings.
---

Tony Blankley is executive vice president of Edelman public relations in Washington. E-mail him at TonyBlankley@gmail.com.

Emphasis mine.

Nobama: We Are No Longer a Christian Nation

H/T to Mike Thayer for this email that got me to looking into this comment.


From a Dear Pastor friend of ours:

Dear Friends: As I was listening to a news program last night (Note: date of the original email is not clear) , I watched in horror as Barack Obama made the statement with pride... we are no longer a Christian nation; we are now a nation of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, . . .

As with so many other statements I've heard him (and his wife) make, I never thought I'd see the day that I'd hear something like that from a presidential candidate in this nation. To think our forefathers fought and died for the right for our nation to be a Christian nation--and to have this man say with pride that we are no longer that.

How far this nation has come from what our founding fathers intended it to be.

I hope that each of you will do what I'm doing now--send your concerns, written simply and sincerely, to the Christians on your email list.

With God's help, and He is still in control of this nation and all else, we can show this man and the world in November that we are, indeed, still a Christian nation!

Please pray for our nation!

Pray that God will give us CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP to guide our nation to be one nation under GOD.

End email.

Then there is this article, "Obama: America is 'no longer Christian' " at World Net Daily.

Here is a You Tube clip:




While Nobama's point of there being Muslims, Hindus, Jews, and non-believers who are a big part of this great and wonderful nation (my emphasis) is stating the obvious; giving the comments meant to take away the emphasis of America being founded upon and BEING a Christian nation is totally unacceptable (once again).

Pastor Ed

It's Time To Put An End To The Obama Nightmare!

It's time to put an end to this nightmare of the Obama run for the the highest office on planet earth. I'm sure that is going to rub some people the wrong way, but enough is enough already. This never ending list of "surely it can't get any worse than this" revelations, must be ended and ended immediately.

The latest revelation that the Senator was trying to influence troop levels with the Iraqi government to make himself look good is the final straw for me! If this candidate is willing to break the Logan Act for his own personal benefit, what else is he capable of?

I said several weeks ago that I would make sure to remind our readers of this nightmare's relationship with Rev Wright. Little did I know at that time what material that would continue to come to light, making the inexperienced Senator one of the worst choices this nation has ever had for the office of President.

When we look at his record, what little there is to check, we see things that not only make him unfit for the office he seeks, but also for the office he is currently taking a government paycheck from.

There is his record on abortion; his connection with admitted domestic terrorist William Ayers; he and his Democratic cronies attacks on Sarah Palin; and also this long list of lies he has been caught in.

When you add the questions about his Islamic background, is there really any doubts that this campaign needs to end, and we Americans need to put an end to it today.

Take time to check out the links and educate yourself on the great "obamination" that as my good friend Snooper calls a clear and present danger to our great nation. After doing so, then please do what you can to make sure this person (notice I only used his name one time the entire article) has no chance to put his "change" on our country.

God Bless America!

Cyber Pastor

Powered by ScribeFire.

Obama's Endorsements From Our Enemies

Crossposted from Roger Gardener's RADARSITE.

 

Originally posted Sunday, June 22, 2008 but still pertinent.



Endorsements from our Enemies: Why Can't Barack Obama Catch a Break from them?



Presidential candidates often seek out endorsements from prominent figures not only nationally, but throughout the world, during election years. What, however, does it say for a candidate when a nation's enemies endorse a candidate?

It's a conspiracy theorists dream situation that Barack Hussein Obama finds himself facing.



The Democratic party front-runner and likely nominee in the upcoming Denver national convention has overcome the Clinton machine, rising through the ranks quickly to go from Congress into not even a full term in the Senate, into the launching position to become, possibly, the President of the United States.



His quick rise to fame and popularity is a tale straight out of the Brothers Grimm; a fairy tale ascension to power from the local to the national level, with a somewhat Messianic appeal to the public that hasn't been seen since the 1930's in Germany. Captivating audiences initially with his message of hope and change, Obama quickly soared into position to take on the "inevitable" Hillary Clinton campaign, ultimately defeating her and ending her hopes of becoming the first woman to gain the White House in the 2008 election cycle.



But at what cost to the nation does the rise of Obama bring? His campaign catch phrases, "hope and change," have done little, really, to address a hope in what, or to address what changes that he intends for the nation, other than mentions of higher taxes and the promise to bring our combat forces home from Iraq within the first year and a half of his administration.



Perhaps, in seeking the true nature and character of the man, candidate Barack Hussein Obama, one should begin by looking at his list not of detractors, but at his list of supporters, and examine the causes they represent.



Jesse Jackson - political activist and civil rights activist. Very spotty record since the King days in his methods of promoting social and political change. Jackson has also been called a "shadow senator" from the District of Columbia.



Jane Fonda - actress and war protester who posed with North Vietnamese forces in a photo-op during the Vietnam War.



Danny Glover - actor cum political activist known for his support of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez.



Bill Maher - Comedian and political commentator host of Politically Incorrect (which it is anything but), known for his anti-American and anti-Christian remarks.



Spike Lee - actor, political activist, director, known for his controversial race relations films and statements.



Mayor Douglas Wilder - Mayor of Richmond, Virginia, and former Governor of Virginia, who called for riots at the Denver DNC if Obama was not the party nominee.



And many others, listed here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign_endorsements



But this is just barely the tip of the iceberg in controversial figures endorsing Obama, and all of the above mentioned are Americans. What about his endorsements from overseas groups? This past week, Obama has received endorsements from two groups who have been and are stated enemies of the United States.



While Sen. Barack Obama sought to improve his relationship with the Jewish community today by meeting with leaders in Philadelphia, comments by a Hamas political adviser this weekend could potentially hurt the Democratic presidential candidate.



During an interview on WABC radio Sunday, top Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said the terrorist group supports Obama’s foreign policy vision.



“We don’t mind–actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance,” Yousef said in response to a question about the group’s willingness to meet with either of the Democratic presidential candidates.



This endorsement brings back up the resignation earlier this year of Obama adviser Rob Malley over controversy surrounding his ties to Hamas. Seeking to put an end to any rumors or speculation of any links to Hamas by Obama, Malley stepped down in an attempt to shed the campaign of such speculations, speculations with have revived with the endorsement of Obama by Hamas leadership this week.



To compound the situation facing the Obama team in light of the Hamas endorsement, Obama received another dubious endorsement this week, this time coming from North Korea.



The Chosun Sinbo, the mouthpiece of North Korea’s Japanese front organization Chongryon and often for the North Korean regime itself, has announced its preference for Obama over McCain, whom it calls “a variant of Bush” and “nothing better than a scarecrow of neoconservatives,” which is a bit odd considering that the Bush Administration’s giveaway diplomacy is better for Kim Jong Il than even Clinton’s awful performance.



So what does this say of the character of candidate Obama, that he receives endorsements from at least two of our nation's enemies? Are there expectations of Obama from these endorsements, or are they merely well wishes from foreign nationals who have interests that are not in the interest of the American people? Given the record of flip-flopping that has been characteristic of Obama of late, and the support of members of the Democratic party being withheld from his campaign, could it be that there are, at this late stage of the election cycle, important issues that we, the voting public are unaware of but that are known to these groups overseas who are endorsing him? Could it be that there is information being gleaned from Barack Hussein Obama's Muslim Kenyan half-brother Malik to which we are not privy?



Whatever the answers, for some reason, two of America's enemies are interested in seeing Barack Hussein Obama elected to the office of the President. Why can't Obama catch a break in endorsements from our enemies? Perhaps it's because he doesn't deserve one...



Posted by HCdL

Once and Always, an American Fighting Man









A note from Radarsite: Bravo! Our good friend and fellow blogger Hawk has come up with an indictment of Barack Hussein Obama worthy of a Federal Grand Jury. If a person is known by the company they keep, then BHO is well known to us. There could be no more damning evidence against this most dangerous of candidates than this list of traitors and anti-Americanists who earnestly support him. How can any reasonable person even consider supporting such a potentially disastrous candidate?



Unfortunately, we know the answer to this question, don't we?

There are those who remain unmoved by even the most blatant evidence against him. They are smitten. They will happily cast their votes for their own doom regardless of our protestations and warnings. They are immune to logic and reason. They are utterly convinced that they are ushering in a New Age of Tolerance and Goodwill to all. They are, they firmly believe, in the vanguard of a new world movement that will banish racism and prejudice from the planet forever. These hapless creatures are beyond hope. We will not move them.



Then there are those others, of course, whose motives are more surreptitious and sinister. These are the hard leftists, the elitist ideologues, the New Age Communists, the One World advocates, for whom all traces of democratic capitalism must be eradicated and replaced with their supercessionist dream. They, too, are untouchable. They will never abandon their ideologies, no matter how many times their bleak and discredited system has been proven to be an unworkable abject failure.



But thankfully there are others. There are all of those good people out there who have not yet committed themselves. They are waiting to be convinced -- one way or the other. They are the ones we could still stand a chance with. They are, in the final analysis, our only hope. Perhaps the world's only hope. And it is for these good people we must continue the fight to the very end.



Thank you Hawk for giving us some powerful and much-needed ammunition for this crucial battle. We need all the help we can get. -rg

See this article in WVW News.net

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5011



For continuing coverage of this story see Mark Harvey's article in Digital Journal



Included are two important comments as well;



 Ryan said...



To be fair, he doesn't necessarily bed with these entities (well, most of them, at least), but the question I find myself asking is the one both you and HCdL alluded to: why would an organization who's mission statement is to destroy the west support Obama? Well, because they see him as the clearer path to America's destruction.



 Seeing the damage they can do and have done with amiable company in the highest echelons of power (thanks to Lionheart), the next question needn't really be asked, but I'll do so anyways: should we trust their judgment? Precedent insists that these people know what they're doing.



They don't need guns. They don't need bombs. All they need is the freedom to act as they will, and the battle is won. They know Obama will give them that freedom.



 PS: then there's the obvious angle of Obama crippling our every military effort abroad, thereby affording them hoards of huddled masses, ripe for forceful conversion.



 Findalis said...



If BO becomes President you will see a reduction in the military to the point where it will be weak and ineffective against anyone. And the destruction of our infrastructure as the money that would be spent on it is given to blacks for reparations. And the removal of guns from all Americans. And the destruction of Israel and the remaking of concentration camps here in the US to finish the job his hero, Hitler started.

Jew4John

Jews4John

by Garry

The Siena Poll of New York likely voters is really going to upset the tummies of the Democrat Party, if they have any sense at all.

New York Jews have not voted republican en masse since Ronald Reagan and as of
six months ago didn't appear to have changed.

The tide has seemingly turned though. In the Siena Poll (cross tabs) section is a demographic which should make Mr Obama start thinking about what to do with all of his spare time after next November.

The issue would be Sen. John McCain garnering 57% of the New York Jewish favorable view and Mr Obama getting a miserable 38% favorable rating.

That is not good news for the Obama/Biden camp, since the last time this
happened Ronaldus Maximus Reagan won in such a landslide the world doesn't even
remember who his opponent was. (actually the guy who ran against Reagan went on
to get a job building houses for free and roaming the globe trash talking the
United States and Israel )

In all, John McCain outscored Obama in most of the categories when the Jewish
vote was tallied. And in many of the areas John McCain outscored Barack Hussein
Obama even when all likely voters were tallied. particularly in areas such as
security, patriotism (go figure).

The Jewish vote really shouldn't be able to make much of a difference in the
total electoral process, but it does tend to do so. Jews make up approximately 2% of the US population, but also have the ability to swing quite a few of the states in which they make up a larger percentage of the population. New York and Pennsylvania are two of those states according to Jeffrey S. Helmreich at Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JPCA).

With fully 55% of the Jewish voters responding they have followed the national race closely, the poll seems to be an indicator of how much the Presidential race concerns a group who tend to focus on the outcome of support or non-support for Israel. Mr. Obama may have been taking the Jewish vote for granted in some of the states he feels are "locked in", but these this poll shows there are no guaranteed voters
outside the Far Left and Far Right voters who will always vote for a Yellow Dog if he runs on the (pick one) ticket.

One other not so surprising statistic which came from the poll shows 50% of Jewish
voters consider John McCain very qualified while only 18% of the Jewish respondents believed Obama to be very qualified.

At this time there are no other comprehensive voter polls which show the complete demographic shift for Sen. John McCain, but the numbers despite being from a relatively small number of respondents shows a shift which is certain to give pause to the Obama camp and reason to reflect on where their priorities lie.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Pete Hegseth on Nobama

Barack, Revealed
Obama’s self-serving machinations in Iraq bespeak a candidate unfit to be commander-in-chief.

By Pete Hegseth

Monday’s New York Post included a revealing column by Amir Taheri, a respected commentator on the Middle East. The piece, bolstered by firsthand reporting, provided a troubling glimpse into Senator Barack Obama’s trip to Iraq in July.

According to Taheri, Sen. Obama used the trip to press Iraqi leaders to delay negotiations with a “weak” and “politically confused” Bush administration. Calling the U.S. presence in Iraq “illegal,” Sen. Obama also tried to press General Petraeus & Co. for a realistic withdrawal date, to no avail.

Go to National Review for the rest of this must read article.

H/T to Snooper at Take Our Country Back for the link to the Hegseth story, and here is Snooper's take on this entire topic:

The Obama Camp Confirms Treason and Logan Act Violations

New VFF Ad

New VFF Ad: Petraeus vs. Obama

Vets for Freedom Members: I wanted you to alert you all to our new television advertisement--"Petraeus vs. Obama." The ad, which started airing last night on national cable, will run extensively for the next week throughout the entire country on Fox, CNN, and MSNBC. The ad provides a direct contrast between what our commanders on the ground are saying and what Senator Obama says about the surge. CLICK HERE to see the ad The intent of the ad is to urge Senator Obama to recognize the success of the surge and applaud the troops through action and not just talk, by supporting Senate Resolution 636. The resolution, which you can read here, may come up for a vote today, and Vets for Freedom will be monitoring the vote closely. We have held dozens of meetings with Senators and Senate staff over the past week about 636, urging consideration of the resolution. I want to thank all of the Vets for Freedom members who have made thousands of phone calls to Senate offices this week, quickly doubling the number of co-sponsors -- We now have 33 Senators on board! Many more Senators have indicated that they will vote for the legislation. But the questions remains--will Senator Obama and other surge--deniers vote for it? We will keep you posted, and appreciate all you do to support our our warriors overseas. Move out and Draw fire, Pete Hegseth Chairman, Vets for Freedom

Powered by ScribeFire.

From Melanie Morgan - Move America Forward Freedom PAC

OBAMA ATTEMPTS TO

STOP U.S. TROOP WITHDRAWAL

DISGRACEFUL ACTION TAKEN IN IRAQ

FOR POLITICAL ADVANTAGE!

Dear Friends:

It is almost impossible to believe Barack Obama can be this arrogant. But
sometimes the worst about politicians is true. It looks like Barack Obama told the Iraqi government to halt negotiations on troop withdrawals until after the election.

Obama is putting his own political objectives ahead of the safety of U.S. troops in Iraq. Apparently this all happened during his celebrated trip to Iraq - yes, the same trip where he refused to meet with American military personnel in the hospital in Germany because they wouldn't let news camera crews turn the visit into a circus and political stunt.

Iraqi government sources have revealed to the New York Post that Presidential
candidate Barack Obama demanded that Iraqi officials stop negotiations
with the Bush Administration to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq. Read
the story for yourself by clicking HERE.

Fearful that the success in Iraq would harm his political aspirations, Obama
sought to keep U.S. troops in Iraq so he can continue attacking the Bush Administration for not imposing a timetable for withdrawal. If these allegations prove to be true, it should be the end of the Obama campaign. The report says this was a demand Obama made to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.

(Zebari with Secretary of State Condi Rice)

You can bet the mainstream media will try to smother this story and keep Americans from finding out about what happened. Only Fox News has reported it so far. That is why we have to get a television commercial together ourselves. But we need your help to produce and air the TV commercial. Please help by contributing now:

Obama should have the decency to recognize that he lacks the moral character
to serve as Commander-in-Chief, and he should withdraw from the
ticket. I have never heard of any candidate deliberately trying to get
Americans killed to prove their point.

According to the New York Post story, not only did Obama seek to get the Iraqi to stop negotiating with Americans on the troop drawdown, he also tried to bully General David Petraeus to agree to a hard withdrawal date.

The hypocrisy of Barack Obama - to say, in the United States, that he wants
a speedier troop withdrawal date - while telling the Iraqis to stop
negotiating is appalling. Even supporters of a quicker U.S. withdrawal
must be sickened by his conduct in Iraq. If there were ever a candidate
who has demonstrated the lack of character and leadership to represent
the United States in foreign affairs, it is Barack Obama.

Please help us to get the facts to the American people. We need to get this
ad produced in the next 24 hours and cannot do it without your support:

Our TROOPS and Our NATION will thank you for it

Powered by ScribeFire.

Obama Test - I'm an Embarrassment

I'm an embarrassment to Barack!


I only scored 17 on the Obama Test

Go Here and see how you do.

Come back and report your score in the comments and let's see who the BIGGEST EMBARRASSMENT really is!

The Accomplishments of Senator Obama

H/T to Snooper.

This JUST in. There is a GREAT book explaining in GREAT detail all of Barack Hussein Obama's accomplishments.

Every dollar collected will be put to a GREATER cause than even Barack The Merciful.

Please help America grow in worldly stature and increase our respect across the Globe.

Thank you.