Powered By Christian Gifts

Showing posts with label Rush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rush. Show all posts

Friday, May 15, 2009

Rush: Pelosi Should "Break The Glass Ceiling" And Resign

H/T to Real Clear Politics.

Submitted by Trevor:

Rush: Pelosi Should "Break The Glass Ceiling" And Resign

Rush Limbaugh on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi: "But we are going to learn soon, folks, if women are the equal of men. We are going to learn very soon if women can finally break the glass ceiling. And you know what the test is? Let me tell you what the test is. Will Nancy Pelosi resign as Speaker of the House? That's the test. Come on now, we've had two men resign as Speaker ... So if women really want equal treatment, if they really want to crash through that glass ceiling, there is no better benchmark than Nancy Pelosi taking herself and her place right alongside two men who resigned."

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Reaction to Wanda Sykes Comments About Rush

This will be a continuing work on the reaction about the pathetic comments Wanda Sykes made about Rush.

This part was sent in by Trevor:

CNN's Rick Sanchez "Rush Limbaugh Is A Good Guy Who Just Has An Act"


and takes a shot at MSNBC???

Monday, May 11, 2009

Rush In a Hurry --- Show Notes

I didn't listen to today's show, but from the notes, it looks like Rush was a on a major roll.

CP

On Today's Show...
Ask Yourself: Has President Obama Kept His Inaugural Promise to End Petty Politics?
Have the political divisions of the past disappeared, America? (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

What Motivates Dick Cheney to Speak Out? (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)
"The biggest mistake Republicans could make is to follow Colin Powell's advice and move to the 'center,' because there is no 'center.' Centrism' is a left-wing code word, just like 'bipartisanship.' Centrism just means agreeing with Democrats and moving in their direction." -Rush Limbaugh

» Dick Morris Gets It Right: No Triangulation Now » Cheney: I'll Take Limbaugh Over Powell

"Dick Cheney is a lone voice in the Republican Party. What motivates him? He's not hot for interns. He has all the money he needs. He's not a torture freak. He doesn't want to run for political office -- and he knows he's toxic to the Drive-By Media. Yet he speaks out when he could just go fishing in peace. What motivates him? It's love for his country." -Rush Limbaugh

A Great New Book by Brian Jennings: "Censorship: The Threat to Silence Talk Radio"

The Real Obama Budget: He's Printing Almost 50¢ for Every $1 He Spends This Year!
He loves this, even though the economy is mired in recession. See, the goal isn't recovery.
The goal is more dependence, more welfare, and reparations. (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

» Double-Wowza: Deficit to Top $1.8T » Oh, Of Course! White House: Deficit Not Our Fault
"How can a government that is $9 trillion in debt take over anything, including health care? They can't afford to take over a kid's lemonade stand on Main Street USA." -Rush Limbaugh

Nancy Pelosi Lied! If a Liberal Tells a Whopper Lie, But Nobody Reports It, Is It Still a Lie?
Pelosi knew all about waterboarding terrorists. She was briefed on it, and supported it, 'cause back then it was fashionable to protect the country. Thanks, Nancy. (Rush 24/7 Members: Listen)

The Revealing Air Force One Photo: Lord Obama's plane HUGE and Lady Liberty...teeny tiny.

Geithner Says Obama's Policies are Designed to "Prevent the Next Boom"
Rush's Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page...
» Rasmussen: Only 24% Understand Cap & Trade » Chavez Troops Seize Oil Service Companies » Obama More Popular Than USA with Muslims » Saudis: Husbands Can Slap Wives for Spending» AP Exposes the Obama Porkulus Scam » Miss California "Controversy" is About Free Speech» White House: No Job Growth in '09 » Obama Threatens to Yank Back California Stimulus Funds

All that and more when we update RushLimbaugh.com!

Now at Rush 24/7:
Monday show audio, pods || Total Stack of Stuff

Send a friend This Link to sign up for the Rush in a Hurry Show Notes

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Newsday Blames Rush for Church Shootings

This email came from Media Research Center. I was waiting to see how long this would take, and I even mentioned it to a friend of mine several days ago. Totally ridiculous!!

CP
David Martin
Executive Vice President
Media Research Center


Ed,

Yesterday, Newsday published a despicable column that directly linked Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and other conservative media to the hideous church shooting that took place last month in Tennessee.

The article -- entitled "Does Shock Jock Hate Speech Lead To Violence?" -- is so outrageous that MRC's President Brent Bozell just drafted a letter to Newsday demanding a retraction.

Go here to access the Newsday article as well as Brent's letter to Newsday:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10117&CID=513&RID=16303894

The Newsday column draws a direct connection between conservative talk radio hosts like Rush and Sean and the brutal murderer -- making them look complicit in those vile acts.

This is so reprehensible, we had to contact our fearless MRC Action Team right away, and give them an opportunity to take immediate action against Newsday.

+ + Action Item: Demand a Retraction From Newsday

We want to follow Brent's letter with thousands of emails fromMRC Action Team Members demanding an apology and retraction.

Please go here right now to send your emails to Publisher Tim Knight and others at Newsday demanding a full apology and retraction for this outrageous story.

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10118&CID=513&RID=16303894

+ + The Left's campaign to discredit conservative media leaders

The fact is, the Left is in the midst of a hideous character assassination campaign against conservative media -- specifically leaders like Rush and Sean -- and they will stop at nothing.

Newsday is not alone. Liberal Jim Wallis' blog included an article on the Tennessee shootings that stated, "we can also connect these deaths to too much toxic talk radio."

That is why Nancy Pelosi and others in Congress want to impose the so-called Fairness Doctrine which would silence conservatives on the radio. That is why Newsday published this article.

If we do not stop Newsday right now, these unwarranted attacks against conservative free speech will only increase.

Newsday should be ashamed! But unless they get overwhelmed with comments from outraged citizens like you, they will continue to print articles like this.

Please send your emails to Newsday right now...

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10119&CID=513&RID=16303894

..and thank you for taking a stand to stop attacks against
conservative leaders like Rush.


David Martin
Executive Vice President
Media Research Center


P.S. Once you have sent your emails, please also call Newsday Publisher Tim Knight at 631-843-3135 and tell him you want a full apology for and retraction of the story, "Does Shock Jock Speech Lead To Violence?"

Friday, May 30, 2008

Big News from Move America Forward


As you've probably heard by now, Move America Forward has launched a drive to send the largest single shipment of care packages to U.S. troops - in history!

Today I am pleased to announce two very big additions to our effort. Talk radio legend, Rush Limbaugh, and television & radio personality Monica Crowley, have both signed on to support this drive and will be appearing on the June 26th 8-hour web-a-thon, "From the Frontlines." (The program will be streamed live online from 4:00pm - Midnight [Eastern] ... 1:00pm - 9:00 pm [Pacific] ).

Details follow below. For right now we need to keep selling more and more care package sponsorships so we can reach our historic goal!

Order online here: CLICK HERE to SPONSOR CARE PACKS FOR TROOPS





This event will be broadcast via live streaming video online at Ustream.TV. Check out the "From the Frontlines" page at U-Stream - HERE.

And we are also pleased to announce that we have retained Kithbridge, Inc. to set up a blog feed - as we enable the blogosphere to help drive this historic effort to support our military men and women.

Keep checking thewww.MoveAmericaForward.org website for exciting new announcements about our historic care package campaign in the coming days!

How Many Degrees of Separation from McClellan to Soros?

McClellan's Publisher a Liberal: Advances Soros & Slams Limbaugh

Photo of Brent Baker.
By Brent Baker May 29, 2008 - 02:35 ET

Peter Osnos, who wrote Wednesday that he “worked very closely” with Scott McClellan on McClellan's new book published by PublicAffairs which Osnos founded, is a liberal whose publishing house is affiliated with the far-left The Nation magazine and the publisher of The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. PublicAffairs has a roster of authors who are nearly all liberals and/or liberal-leaning mainstream media figures,including six books by far-left bank-roller George Soros. On Wednesday's CBS Evening News, Ari Fleischer related that “Scott told me that his editor did 'tweak,' in Scott's word, a lot of the writing, especially in the last few months.” In an “Eat the Press” blog entry Wednesday,Rachel Sklar asked Osnos: “Did you work directly on the book with McClellan? (Who was his editor?)” Osnos replied: “The editor was Lisa Kaufman and yes, I worked very closely with them.”

A reporter and editor at the Washington Post during the 1970s and 1980s before going into book publishing, Osnos pens a weekly column for the left of center The Century Foundation. In a March column he denounced Rush Limbaugh as “bombastic, aggressive, and mean,”bemoaning how the late William F. Buckley Jr. left behind “a right-wing culture that tends to be as coarse and leaden as his demeanor could be buoyant,” charging Buckley provided “unfortunate cover to others who followed with a spirit that was distinctly and consistently malevolent.”

In contrast, he hailed the late left-wing columnist Molly Ivins and wished she had more impact: “In the contest for power in America, Molly Ivins had a good perch in her column, nearly perfect pitch, and, alas, too little influence.” Ruminating this week about the Kennedy family's legacy in the wake of Senator Ted Kennedy's cancer diagnosis, Osnos asserted that “we are a distinctly better country for the message” which “Ted conveyed about our priorities as a people.”

Amongst the authors Osnos has worked with at PublicAffairs and previously at Random House: Wesley Clark, Vernon Jordan, Robert McNamara, Andy Rooney, George Soros, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Rosalyn Carter, Nancy Reagan, Sam Donaldson, Morley Safer, Molly Ivins and William Greider. Hard to find more than a few conservative names in the PublicAffairs list of authors.

At the moment, a George Soros book is displayed alongside the McClellan tome at the top of thePublicAffairs home page.

PublicAffairs is part of the Perseus Books Group, which also owns Nation Books, “a project of The Nation Institute” which publishes the magazine of the same name, and Vanguard Press, whose home page now features The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, a new book by Vincent Bugliosi that “presents a tight, meticulously researched legal case that puts George W. Bush on trial in an American courtroom for the murder of nearly 4,000 American soldiers fighting the war in Iraq.”

The PublicAffairs bio for Osnos:

FOUNDER AND EDITOR-AT-LARGE

Peter Osnos was a correspondent around the world for The Washington Post and the newspaper's foreign and national editor. He was Associate Publisher and senior editor at Random House and publisher of Random House's Times Books division. In 1997, he founded PublicAffairs, an independent publishing company specializing in books of journalism, history, biography and social criticism. Among the authors he published at PublicAffairs are, Wesley Clark, Dorothy Height, Vernon Jordan, Wendy Kopp, Robert McNamara, Andy Rooney, Natan Sharansky, George Soros, Boris Yeltsin, and Muhammad Yunus, and journalists from America's leading publications and prominent scholars.

He is executive director of The Caravan Project, funded by the MacArthur Foundation, which is developing a plan for multi-platform publishing of books. He is Vice Chairman of the Columbia Journalism Review and is active in a number of other journalism and human rights organizations. He writes a regular media column that is distributed by the Century Foundation (www.TCF.org). He is a graduate of Brandeis and Columbia Universities. He lives in Greenwich CT with his wife Susan, a consultant to human rights organizations.

The Century Foundation's bio:

Senior Fellow for Media Program

Peter Osnos is the Founder and Editor-at-Large of PublicAffairs books. Previously, he was Publisher of Random House's Times Books Division from 1991 to 1996 and before that was a Vice President and Associate Publisher of the Random House imprint. Authors he has worked with include President Bill Clinton, former President Jimmy Carter, Rosalyn Carter, Nancy Reagan, former Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill, Boris Yeltsin, Paul Volcker, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Donald Trump, Clark Clifford, Sam Donaldson, Morley Safer, Peggy Noonan, Molly Ivins, Stanley Karnow, Jim Lehrer, William Novak, Vassily Aksyonov, and journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, Newsweek, and The Economist.

Before entering book publishing, Osnos spent nearly twenty years at The Washington Post, where he was variously Indochina Bureau Chief, Moscow Correspondent, Foreign Editor, National Editor, and London Bureau Chief. He has been a commentator and host for National Public Radio and a contributor to publications including Foreign Affairs, The Atlantic, and The New Republic. He served as Chair of the Trade Division of the Association of American Publishers, Chair of Human Rights Watch Europe and Central Asia Committee and was a member of the Board of Directors of Human Rights Watch. He is currently the Vice-Chairman of The Columbia Journalism Review and Executive Director of The Caravan Project, funded by the MacArthur Foundation and based at TCF. A graduate of Brandeis University and the Columbia University School of Journalism, he lives in Greenwich, Connecticut with his wife, Susan Osnos, who is a consultant for nonprofit organizations.

An excerpt from Osnos' May 28 column, as posted by The Century Foundation:

....The Kennedy saga is so rich a tale of melodrama and pain that it tends to overwhelm the real meaning of what it has meant to our politics and national spirit. We are a distinctly better country for the messages, each in their own way and time that JFK, RFK, and Ted conveyed about our priorities as a people. Regularly over the presidential cycles, "the next Kennedy" has been anointed, invariably ending with disappointment. There was Ted himself in 1980, Gary Hart in 1984 and 1988, and aspects of Clinton in 1992 and John Kerry (another JFK, after all) in 2004. It has happened again this year with Barack Obama, and this time the comparison may be genuinely valid....

Obama definitely has elements of JFK's style and eloquence as well as RFK's appeal to blacks and younger people. Ted Kennedy clearly feels a strong bond with Obama, as does his niece, Caroline, given their endorsement and the campaigning they have done on his behalf. Senator Kennedy has been the only member of his clan able to fulfill the potential of early promise (his son Patrick, in Congress; his nephew Joe, a former congressmen; his niece Kathleen, who ran and lost for a Senate seat, have had small impact so far). It is possible that with the Obama candidacy, as Ted Sorensen once wrote (or as, he insists, helped to write), "the torch has been passed to a new generation."

From his March 4 column:

....But the dominant voices of the Buckley succession are bombastic, aggressive, and mean -- O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Ann Coulter, among many others. They are despisers, whose vituperative name-calling regards alternative viewpoints as stupid, venal, or treasonous. The #1 bestseller on the New York Times bestseller list for March 9 is a quintessential example of the genre: Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning. It has sold about 50,000 copies in its first two months. Among his chapter headings are "Adolph Hitler: Man of the Left"; and "Brave New Village: Hillary Clinton and the Meaning of Liberal Fascism." His argument, as summarized in the Washington Post's review is that "fascists and liberals seek to use the state to solve the problems of modern society." Goldberg is an editor at the National Review Online. His mother, Lucianne Goldberg, made her name (and gave his a career boost) as the literary agent who urged Linda Tripp to tape her conversations with Monica Lewinsky. As vice-president of his mother's agency, Goldberg once wrote, he did his time "in the trenches of Clinton's trousers."

William F. Buckley is getting a splendid send-off as befits a long life of creative activity, discernible impact on the world around, him and extensive personal outreach. But in passing judgment on his influence, it is also fair to single out the sour side of what he leaves behind: a right-wing culture that tends to be as coarse and leaden as his demeanor could be buoyant. Buckley was excellent at what he did, giving unfortunate cover to others who followed with a spirit that was distinctly and consistently malevolent.

His September 18 column:

....We could sure use Molly Ivins's impeccable instincts about these expert opinions. Maybe this time, we'd listen. Molly was a populist in a splendid American tradition. One of her best columns opposing the invasion (the one in which she predicted civil war) was on the occasion of Martin Luther King Day in 2003.

"The war is not inevitable," she wrote "and the person who can stop it is you. Monday Jan. 20 is Dr. King's holiday. People all over the country will be rallying and marching in his honor, celebrating not only his eloquent opposition to racism and poverty, but his equally passionate protests against militarism. You get more than a vote in this country. You get to speak up."

In the contest for power in America, Molly Ivins had a good perch in her column, nearly perfect pitch, and, alas, too little influence.

Update 11:02 Matthew Sheffield. The media's lack of interest in pursuing the Soros angle of McClellan's story is a perfect contrast to Katie Couric's charge that former press secretary's critics were somehow coordinating "talking points."

It's also interesting to note that when it came to former Clinton admin officials writing tell-alls, the liberal press took a decidedly negative approach.

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center

Thursday, May 29, 2008

"Undeniable Truths"

Thanks to Groovy Lady for this piece. You can find it at this link:

From the 'Lectric Law Library's stacks
Rush Limbaugh's Original & Updated 35 'Undeniable Truths'


The "Undeniable Truths" were part of an article he wrote for the Sacramento Union back in 1988. 

Here they are:  

1. The greatest threat to humanity lies in the nuclear arsenal of the USSR.  
2. The greatest threat to humanity lies in the USSR.  
3. Peace does not mean the elimination of nuclear weapons.  
4. Peace does not mean the absence of war.  
5. War is not obsolete.  
6. Ours is a world governed by the aggressive use of force.  
7. There is only one way to get rid of nuclear weapons - use them.  
8. Peace cannot be achieved by developing a "understanding" with the Russian People.  
9. When Americans oppose America, it is not always courageous and sacred; it is sometimes dangerous.  
10. Communism Kills.  
11. Neither the US, nor anyone else, imposes freedom on the peoples of other nations.  
12. Freedom is God given.  
13. In the USSR, peace means the absence of opposition.  
14. To free peoples, peace means the absence of threats and the presence of justice.  
15. The Peace Movement in the US, whether by accident or design, is pro-Communist.  
16. The collective knowledge and wisdom of seasoned citizens is the most valuable, yet untapped, 
resource our young-people have.  
17. The greatest football team in the history of civilization is the Pittsburgh Steelers of 1975-1980.  
18. There is no such thing as war atrocities.  
19. War itself is an atrocity.  
20. There is a God.  
21. Abortion is wrong. 
22. Morality is not defined and cannot be defined by individual choice.  
23. Evolution cannot explain Creation.  
24. Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women access to the mainstream of society.  
25. Love is the only human emotion that cannot be controlled.  
26. The only difference between Mikhail Gorbachev and previous Soviet leaders, is that 
Gorbachev is alive. 
27. Soviet Leaders are just left-wing dictators.  
28. Abe Lincoln saved this nation.  
29. The L.A. Raiders will never be the team that they were when they called Oakland their home. 
30. The US will again go to war.  
31. To more and more people, a victorious US is a sinful US.  
32. This is frightening and ominous.  
33. There will always be poor people.  
34. This is not the fault of the rich.  
35. You should thank God for making you an American; and instead of feeling guilty about it, 
help spread our ideas worldwide.  

Rush has updated this list, many of the "old" UTOL having become somewhat dated (but no less true for
being in the past tense!) As read by Rush Limbaugh on his radio show, Friday, February 18, 1994:  
(All equally truthful: number 1 is not more or less important than 35.)  

1. There is a distinct singular American culture - rugged individualism and self-reliance - which made 
America great.  
2. The vast majority of the rich in this country did not inherit their wealth; they earned it. They are the 
country's achievers, producers, and job creators.  
3. No nation has ever taxed itself into prosperity.  
4. Evidence refutes liberalism.  
5. There is no such thing as a New Democrat.  
6. The Earth's eco-system is not fragile.  
7. Character matters; leadership decends from character.  
8. The most beautiful thing about a tree is what you do with it after you cut it down.  
9. Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the twentieth century.  
10. The 1980s was not a decade of greed but a decade of prosperity; it was the longest period 
of peacetime growth in American history.  
11. Abstinence prevents sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy -every time it's tried.  
12. Condoms only work during the school year.  
13. Poverty is not the root ("rut") cause of crime.  
14. There's a simple way to solve the crime problem: obey the law; punish those who do not.  
15. If you commit a crime, you are guilty.  
16. Women should not be allowed on juries where the accused is a stud.  
17. The way to improve our schools is not more money, but the reintroduction of moral and 
spiritual values, as well as the four "R's": reading, 'riting, 'rithmatic, and Rush.  
18. I am not arrogant.  
19. My first 35 Undeniable Truths are still undeniably true.  
20. There is a God.  
21. There is something wrong when critics say the problem with America is too much religion.  
22. Morality is not defined by individual choice.  
23. The only way liberals win national elections is by pretending they're not liberals. 
24. Feminism was established as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.  
25. Follow the money. When somebody says, "It's not the money," it's always the money.  
26. Liberals attempt through judicial activism what they cannot win at the ballot box.  
27. Using federal dollars as a measure, our cities have not been neglected, but poisoned with 
welfare dependency funds.  
28. Progress is not striving for economic justice or fairness, but economic growth.  
29. Liberals measure compassion by how many people are given welfare. Conservatives measure 
compassion by how many people no longer need it.  
30. Compassion is no substitute for justice.  
31. The culture war is between the winners and those who think they're losers who want to become 
winners. The losers think the only way they can become winners is by banding together all the losers 
and then empowering a leader of the losers to make things right for them.  
32. The Los Angeles riots were not caused by the Rodney King verdict. The Los Angeles riots 
were caused by rioters.  
33. You could afford your house without your government - if it weren't for your government.  
34. Words mean things.  
35. Too many Americans can't laugh at themselves anymore.  

----- Brought to you by - The 'Lectric Law Library The Net's Finest Legal Resource For Legal Pros & 
Laypeople Alike. 

Thursday, May 8, 2008

From "Rush in a Hurry"

Pearl of Wisdom: "According to the Department of Energy, US oil production has fallen approximately 40% since 1985, while US consumption has grown more than 30%. There is enough oil in the areas that we have placed off limits, 112 billion barrels, to power more than 60 million cars for 60 years without importing a drop."

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Pelosi: Misquote or Lie - You Decide

Original tip for this came from "Rush In a Hurry".

From Rush's Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page:

She Didn't "Misquote;" She Lied: Pelosi Made Up Earth Day Bible Quote

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biblical Scholars Challenge Pelosi's 'Scripture' Quote

By Pete Winn
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
April 23, 2008

(CNSNews.com) - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is fond of quoting a particular passage of Scripture. The quote, however, does not appear in the Bible and is "fictional," according to biblical scholars.

In her April 22 Earth Day news release, Pelosi said, "The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.' On this Earth Day, and every day, let us pledge to our children, and our children's children, that they will have clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and the opportunity to experience the wonders of nature."

Cybercast News Service
 repeatedly queried the speaker's office for two days to determine where the alleged Bible quote is found. Thus far, no one has responded.

Distinguished biblical scholars, however, cast doubt on the existence of the passage.

John J. Collins, the Holmes professor of Old Testament criticism and interpretation at Yale Divinity School, said he is totally unfamiliar with Pelosi's quotation.

"(It's) not one that I recognize," Collins told 
Cybercast News Service. "I assume that she means this is a paraphrase. But it wouldn't be a close paraphrase to anything I know of."

Claude Mariottini, a professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, told 
Cybercast News Service the passage not only doesn't exist - it's "fictional."

"It is not in the Bible," Mariottini said. "There is nothing that even approximates that."

Other scholars agree that nothing remotely resembling it can be found in any version of the Scriptures - Old Testament or New Testament. 

"The quote does not exist in the Old Testament, neither in the New Testament," said the Rev. Andreas Hock, a doctor of Scripture who teaches in the Roman Catholic archdiocese of Denver's St. John Vianney Seminary.

"Even in pieces or bits, (it) cannot be found in the Old Testament," he added. 

Interestingly, Pelosi has mentioned the quote before, Mariottini noted. 

"In truth, (she) has used this 'passage' in many different ways, and all of those usages have nothing to do with the Bible whatsoever," he said. 

Indeed, 
Cybercast News Service has learned that Pelosi has repeatedly used the quote: 

-- In December 2005, in a Christmas message to the U.S. House of Representatives, Pelosi said: "Mr. Speaker, as we leave for this Christmas recess, let us say, 'God bless you' to the American people by voting against this Republican budget and statement of injustice and immorality, and let us not let the special interest goose get fat at the expense of America's children.

"The gentleman from Washington [state], Mr. McDermott, quoted the prophet Isaiah. And as the Bible teaches us, to minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship, to ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us. Let us vote no on this budget as an act of worship and for America's children."

-- On Feb. 8, 2007, in remarks before the U.S. House Science and Technology Committee, when it held hearings on global warming, she used the same quote, verbatim, as in her Earth Day release.

-- On April 6, 2007, in congressional remarks before the Easter recess: "In this Holy Week, we are reminded of these words in the Old Testament: 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.' We must move quickly to honor God's creation by reducing greenhouse gas pollution in the United States and around the world."

-- On April 25, 2007, in a speech to the League of Conservation Voters in Washington, D.C.: "We are now charging ahead to tackle one of humanity's greatest challenges yet - global warming. We will do this because we hold our children's future in our hands - not our grandchildren, or great-grandchildren, but our own children. "As it says in the Old Testament, 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.'" 

-- On Oct. 22, 2007, in a television interview with PBS host Tavis Smiley, she used it in discussion of her roots, attributing the quote to the book of Isaiah: "I'm raised in a family in Baltimore, Maryland, my father was the mayor. He was in Congress when I was born. And we were devoutly Catholic, very patriotic. We love America. Devoutly Catholic, deeply patriotic, proud of our Italian American heritage, and in our case, staunchly Democratic. 

"And that faith was related to our Democratic values. That is to say, the gospel of Matthew: 'When I was hungry, you gave me to eat.' You know, the least of our brethren. So that's an inspiration in the New Testament. In the Old Testament, Isaiah says, 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the god who made us.'" 

Mis-remembered? Mis-paraphrased? 

Is Pelosi's alleged quote merely an attempt to express a biblical principle about man's need to care for the environment? The scholars differed slightly on that question, but none believe the case for environmentalism comes directly form Scripture, as Pelosi indicated. 

Eric Jenislawski, a professor at Virginia's Christendom College, said that the Bible teaches in Genesis that man was placed on earth "to till it and keep it" (Genesis 2:15). But just a few verses earlier, he pointed out, God also commanded man "to fill the earth and subdue it" (Genesis 1:28).

"Responsible use of the Old Testament cannot divorce the biblical notion of stewardship (that man is obligated to care for God's creation) from the equally important biblical view that the entire natural world was created for man, for him to subdue it and to reign over it," Jenislawski said. 

"Environmentalists who make man subservient to the natural world actually invert the biblical view of man's relationship to the earth," he said.

Collins agreed.

"You can interpret Genesis, Chapter One, in various ways, but I think this would be going well beyond the text," said Collins. 

Mark Goodwin, an associate professor of theology at the University of Dallas, said Pelosi's quote only reflects a partial Scriptural truth, at best. 

"'To minister to the needs of creation is an act of worship' doesn't sound right to my ears," Goodwin said. "To minister to the needs of creation'- yes, but not as an act of worship. I'm not sure what she meant by that, and if I were there, I would have raised my hand and asked her to clarify that."

Westminster Theological Seminary professor Peter Enns told 
Cybercast News Service that there is nothing in the Bible even approaching a proof-text for Earth Day. 

"As wise an idea as it might be to be concerned about the environment, I think to find a specific biblical anchor in the Old Testament might be asking things of the Bible it's just not prepared to deliver," Enns said. 

"To say that humanity (is the steward) of creation is not so much - in the ancient world -a statement that the goodness of creation has to be protected, but more a statement in the Bible of the supremacy of humanity as the pinnacle of creation," he added.

Mariottini, meanwhile, said he doesn't think Pelosi is either mis-remembering or mis-paraphrasing. 

"People try to use the Bible to give authority to what they are trying to say," he said. "(This) is one of those texts that you fabricate in order to support what you want to say.